On September 22nd, 2016, the Professional Development and Competence Committee of the Law Society of Upper Canada released its Report to Convocation, addressing the Pathways Pilot Project. In that report, the committee recommended ending the Law Practice Program following the completion of its third year (2016-2017) because it “[…]does not appear to be providing an alternative to articling that has gained acceptance by candidates and the profession and that is sustainable in the long term.” (Report to Convocation – September 22, 2016, page 2)
Following the release of that report, the LSUC received “[…] 93 public submissions from individuals, plus 104 additional individual comments linked to a petition, and 32 from organizations, associations, legal clinics, law schools and others.” The overwhelming majority of these submissions argued in favour of retaining the program, citing – amongst other things – the lack of verifiable data to support the allegation of the creation of a two-tiered system, as well as their own positive experiences with the LPP.
Wednesday evening, capping an unseasonably warm Fall day in Ottawa, was an event hosted by the National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL) to formally launch their new bilingual, free, web-based Feminist Law Reform 101 course. The evening provided its many attendees with the opportunity to connect with like-minded people while offering them a look at this terrific new resource.
In attendance at the event were newly-appointed Senator Kim Pate, Shirley E. Greenberg – who attended law school in the 1970s and has long been a trailblazer for the Women’s Rights movement – and The Honourable Patti Hajdu, Federal Minister of Status of Women. Both Greenberg and Hajdu addressed the crowd and recounted their – very inspiring – experiences of working in predominantly masculine fields. While Greenberg light-heartedly shared her hope that there were budding “rich women” present in the crowd who could, one day, finance Women’s Rights initiatives, Hajdu cautioned the audience that the fight for equality wasn’t yet over. She told of a few instances in which she and her female colleagues on the Hill experienced some differential treatment that was likely due to their gender. Though she vehemently assured the audience that her lived experiences did not stem from a place of unkindness, she did use those examples to highlight society’s underlying gender inequalities.