The Power of Perspectives

The Canadian Bar Association

Jennifer Taylor

Women in politics

Answering the call: Advice for women thinking about running for public office

By Jennifer Taylor June 18, 2018 18 June 2018

Answering the call: Advice for women thinking about running for public office

 

“We need more women in politics” has become a louder refrain since the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The data suggest women are taking this mandate to heart – not only in the U.S., where record numbers of women will run in the upcoming midterm elections, but in Canada, where organizations like Equal Voice are holding workshops and leading campaigns to encourage more women to run for elected office.

Claudia Chender is one woman who answered the call. A lawyer and graduate of UVic Law, Chender is the New Democratic Party (NDP) member of the legislative assembly for the Nova Scotia riding of Dartmouth South, where I live. She was elected last spring.

I sat down with her to talk about her first year in politics and get some advice for women thinking about making the leap. (Full disclosure: I canvassed for Chender a couple of times during the campaign.) Here is what I learned.

Read More
The CBA and the #MeToo campaign

MeToo: Something new to say, or a new way to say it

By Jennifer Taylor February 12, 2018 12 February 2018

MeToo: Something new to say, or a new way to say it

 

Sexual misconduct by men against women is a tale as old as time. What’s new is how two related movements—Me Too and Time’s Up—have quickly become cultural shorthand for telling this story, and proven to have real consequences for those who commit sexual misconduct. The labels Me Too, with its sense of solidarity, and Time’s Up, with its sense of urgency, offer a framework for talking about, and acting on, the complex and longstanding problems of workplace sexual harassment, sexual assault, and gendered power imbalances.

It’s a moment of reckoning.

For lawyers especially, it means reckoning with uncomfortable issues. Like the fact that the justice system doesn’t always provide satisfactory consequences when sexual misconduct occurs. (Or offer much in the way of preventing sexual misconduct before it happens.)

The justice system as traditionally understood doesn’t always find the truth, either, which is one reason Me Too and Time’s Up have been driven by media reporting rather than court proceedings.

These movements prioritize truth. In the justice system, truth is often competing with other values.

Read More
Reproductive rights

There’s no Charter problem with Canada Summer Jobs

By Jennifer Taylor January 22, 2018 22 January 2018

There’s no Charter problem with Canada Summer Jobs

It seems self-evident in 2018 that an anti-abortion organization should not receive federal government funds to hire summer students. And yet, the guide for the Canada Summer Jobs program—which requires applicants to attest that the proposed job and their organization’s core mandate respect reproductive rights—has caused an outcry. It’s even prompted an application for judicial review by Toronto Right to Life (TRTL) on the basis that it may infringe the Charter-protected “freedom of conscience and religion of organizations that consider abortion to be immoral” and potentially the Charter’s freedom of expression and equality guarantees as well (to the extent that organizations even have Charter rights, which is debatable).

But the attestation’s opponents are minimizing an essential question: what about the Charter rights of women, like the right to autonomy over their own bodies?

Opponents like Brian Bird emphasize that the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision in R v Morgentaler — a ruling long celebrated as a victory for Canadian women — did not “constitutionally guarantee unrestricted access to abortion in Canada”, as if that provides a complete answer to the question. It doesn’t.

Read More
Constitutional

Who’s a parent? A Nova Scotia adoption case with constitutional implications

By Jennifer Taylor April 7, 2017 7 April 2017

Who’s a parent? A Nova Scotia adoption case with constitutional implications

 

Can a court issue a notice of constitutional question on its own motion?

That question is currently before the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in an adoption case that has implications for women’s reproductive choices.

The court heard an appeal on March 30, 2017 from the decision of a Supreme Court Family Division judge to address whether a biological father – unidentified in the case at hand – has the constitutional right to be notified of an application to put a child up for adoption. Background information is reported in an earlier decision, but identifying details are subject to a publication ban under the province’s Children and Family Services Act.

Under that law, a biological mother signed an agreement with the Minister of Community Services to put her child up for adoption. The prospective adoptive parents then filed a Notice of Proposed Adoption. This is a routine proceeding, and all involved likely expected the court to issue the adoption order without question. It didn’t turn out that way. The court was concerned that the biological father was not involved.

Read More
Meaning of consent

Involuntary parenthood claims don’t pay

By Jennifer Taylor March 28, 2017 28 March 2017

Involuntary parenthood claims don’t pay

 

There is no right to sue for “involuntary parenthood.” That’s according to the Court of Appeal for Ontario in PP v DD, which upheld a lower court decision to toss out a father’s lawsuit against his former female sexual partner for making him a parent before he wanted to become one.

The decision helps prevent tort law from being used to control women by making them pay – literally – for the consequences of their reproductive choices.

I wrote about the lower court decision last year, arguing that it was the right call for women’s reproductive autonomy.

Let’s back up and recall the facts: PP, the male plaintiff (a doctor), and DD, the female defendant (who also worked in health care), had a brief sexual relationship in 2014. PP understood that DD took birth control pills, so they did not use condoms. DD became pregnant and informed PP, who suggested that she have an abortion. DD decided to have the baby, born in early 2015.

Read More