The Power of Perspectives

The Canadian Bar Association

National Blog

When the executive decides on the judiciary's budget

By Yves Faguy April 12 2013 12 April 2013

    Mediation, ADR, and unbundling of legal services have clearly emerged in recent years as a promising (if albeit partial) solutions to improving access to an underfunded justice system. At the same time there is a recognition, in the legal community, that emphasis on these kinds of innovations must not detract from the fact that the legal system nevertheless remains underfunded. Antoine Leduc, who we interviewed recently, raises an important point about the politics of financing our justice system.

    Read More

    Access to justice for the middle class

    By Yves Faguy April 11 2013 11 April 2013

      Here’s another interesting paper from the CBA Access to Justice Committee, which looks at the distinct needs of the middle class. What’s interesting about this study is that it recognizes that different populations have different needs, and therefore can benefit in different ways from innovations to access to justice. The trouble is, people (including those from the middle class) don’t always know where to go:

      In addition to having a greater financial “safety net”, those in the middle class may have greater resources, for example in terms of education, literacy and health, to address legal problems that arise. With the right information, this population may be better able to prevent an ordinary life problem from becoming a “legal problem”, or be able to access an appropriate level of help, geared to the degree and nature of their legal problem. They may be able to consider options in terms of service delivery and service deliverers, and choose what they can best afford, sufficient to address their situation. They may be able to use information and tools to avoid the justice system entirely when that is the best solution. Innovations should not be limited, therefore, to those pertaining to the formal justice system. Nor should they be limited to options that require lawyers’ involvement, and in fact, many options rely on other sources of legal information, assistance and representation. That said, where a lawyer’s skills and training are required, individuals who retain counsel achieve better and fairer outcomes than those who are unrepresented. Sometimes lawyers are essential for a just result.

      So having a broader range of legal services available at different price points, provided the public is aware of these options, would go a long way to making things better. Read the report and you'll find some surprising findings from studies that seem to indicate that people who use lawyers are more satisfied with the results, given what they paid, than what we might think. That said, it's worth highlighting the last line in the paragraph quoted above. Obviously, finding innovative solutions to improve access to justice for most is a worthy goal. Even so, the CBA has always held firm to the position that “the legal needs of this significant majority must not obscure or detract from the need and public responsibility to find comprehensive solutions that will also properly address the legal needs of the most vulnerable and marginalized populations.”

      Read More

      How do we measure the performance of our justice system?

      By Yves Faguy April 10 2013 10 April 2013

        Anecdotal evidence isn't enough. We need empirical data.

        Last week, the CBA’s Access to Justice Committee released a discussion paper on the need for better metrics about access to justice. Generally, it explores the challenge of quantifying access to justice by outlining the components of how to frame metrics and offers some examples of existing approaches and methods:

        The development of access to justice metrics is an important building block for reform. Metrics would serve a range of purposes from informing the public about their justice system, to informing policy making processes and supporting change processes. Metrics are also likely “to enhance users’ choice, to enable comparison and learning, to increase transparency, and to create incentives for improving access to justice.” There is a growing awareness concerning the utility of increased empirical knowledge about the functioning of the justice system, but uneasiness over how to meet that goal. In short the challenge is: “can we make access to justice a quantifiable concept instead of a broad aspiration?” (More after the jump)

        Read More

        Is Axiom Law even a law firm?

        By Yves Faguy April 10 2013 10 April 2013

          Not according to Richard Granat, who thinks it's time that state bar associations take a closer look at this new kind of legal services provider:

          Axiom Law is demonstrating that certain kinds of services can be delivered at a much lower price, without compromising quality. By enabling corporate counsel to get done certain kinds of legal work that ordinarily would be provided by outside counsel at a much higher price, Axiom has opened up a major market be simply segmenting the kind of work that can be done more efficiently in-house with help from Axiom.

          It seems to me, however, that an in-house counsel assumes the risk of malpractice when they contract with Axiom. Axiom is not a law firm so it can't secure a law firm malpractice insurance policy. Moreover, the supervisor of the legal work is not Axiom, (technically it can't be), but in-house counsel. When in-house counsel contracts with a company like Axiom they give up the assurance of quality legal services and accountability that they get from a traditional law firm. The in-counsel is self-insuring that the legal services that they are providing to themselves are correct, accurate, and valid for the situation at at hand. General Counsel of major companies -- welcome to the DIY movement!!.


          It's worth reading the whole article.

          Read More

          A2J and the law of unintended consequences

          By Yves Faguy April 9 2013 9 April 2013

            In a report prepared for one of the working groups of the Action Committee on Access to Justice In Civil and Family Matters, Alison MacPhail explains the perception that the legal system never changes and that the system is designed to serve judges and lawyers instead of the public:

            Even when a problem gets to the justice system, it is often not a court – with the exception of family law. Instead, the matter is often resolved through an adjudication process by one of a variety of administrative tribunals dealing with landlord/tenant, social services, employment, workers compensation, human rights issues, etc. These specialized courts or tribunals can be more responsive to the real situations people face, and seem more able to innovate.

            Changes have recently occurred however in these tribunals, as well as in courts which were designed for citizens to participate without counsel – such as small claims court. Citizens are increasingly appearing with counsel. And in a diametrically opposite trend, the courts that were designed for representation by lawyers are seeing an enormous rise in self-representation.

            Read More

            The laws of global business and their limits

            By Yves Faguy April 9 2013 9 April 2013

              I recently sat down with Antoine Leduc, a partner at BCF in Montreal to discuss his recently published book on the globalization of secured transactions. It's a very thoughtful comparative study with some fascinating insight on the globalization of business law.  In the video below, he discusses how international financial institutions drive the global harmonization of our laws, as well as some of the limits they have encountered along the way.

               

              Read More

              Canadian authorities ponder a more poisonous pill

              By Yves Faguy April 8 2013 8 April 2013

                For some time now, a growing number of voices have been calling on Canada's provincial secuirities regulators to review the rules governing shareholder rights plans -- or poison pills, as they're known. The notion is that Canadian companies are viewed as easy takeover targets, and boards need more effective tools to balance their own needs with the interests of outside bidders and shareholders (more after the jump).

                Read More

                Is the LPO fad beginning to fade?

                By Yves Faguy April 2 2013 2 April 2013

                  There’s no question that last week was a rough one for Integreon, as news circulated that two UK-based firms, Osborne Clarke and CMS Cameron McKenna, are scaling back their arrangements with the legal process outsourcer. So, does the story signal a trend away from outsourcing arrangements? It’s hard to say. CMS managing partner Duncan Weston is quoted by The Lawyer as saying that his firm is looking for another third-party provider to cover some of the work that Integreon had been tasked with doing. Still, it’s worth reading Catrin Griffiths’ item from last October in which she lays out some of the reasons LPOs are experiencing growing pains. Interestingly, she argues that much of the resistance to LPOs is coming from in-house lawyers. And, predictably perhaps, there’s the fact that traditional firms are adapting  (more after the jump).

                  Read More

                  Banning Twitter in the courts

                  By Yves Faguy April 1 2013 1 April 2013

                    Criminal defence lawyer and blogger Véronique Robert applauds the Twitter/email ban in Quebec’s courts. Neither the legal community or journalists, she argues, have shown themselves to be ready to make responsible use of Twitter from inside the courtrooms (more after the jump).

                    Read More

                    Engaging the public on justice for families

                    By Yves Faguy March 28 2013 28 March 2013

                      In his Globe article yesterday, Kirk Makin identified many of the key points in the Report of the Family Justice Working Group of the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters. There’s another point that deserves mention however: The limited attention paid by the public to the family justice system. Here’s what the report says:

                      Despite its high rates of engagement with the family justice system on an individual basis, the general public pays relatively little attention to family law. The media focus is substantially on criminal law cases and the public tends to view and evaluate the justice system through a criminal law lens. The greater media attention to, and corresponding public engagement with issues of crime translate into heightened political interest and investment in criminal law matters. This has already had a measurably negative effect on family law in an environment that has seen family law legal aid budgets diminish significantly in the face of relentless resource pressures from criminal justice.

                      At the same time, natural advocates for the family justice system have not emerged as strongly as in criminal law where institutional players, such as Crown, police and corrections appear to have a greater capacity to pursue a reform agenda. On the political question of resource allocation at least, it is apparent that more assertive and sustained advocacy combined with highly visible leadership are needed to better assert the interests of families and children.

                      So we’ll be discussing more of this in the weeks to come leading up to the CBA’s Envisioning Equal Justice summit to be held in Vancouver in late April.

                      Read More

                      Ontario's summary judgments

                      By Yves Faguy March 26 2013 26 March 2013

                        The CBA intervened today before the Supreme Court of Canada in Bruno Appliance v. Hryniak and Hryniak v. Mauldin, two appeals interpreting the summary judgment rules in Ontario. David Sterns and Paul Sweeny represented CBA. National caught up with them for this interview and asked why lawyers across Canada should pay attention to the decision:

                        Read More

                        Are lawyers outside B.C. required to collect B.C. PST?

                        By Cyndee Todgham Cherniak March 24 2013 24 March 2013

                          This short blog post focusses on PST Bulletin 106 "Legal Services" that was released on March 19, 2013 (re-released with amendments).  It does not focus on the legislative provisions because auditors often conduct audits based on the administrative policies that they are to follow.

                          Under the new British Columbia Provincial Sales Tax ("BC PST") rules, legal services are subject to BC PST.  PST Bulletin 106 "Legal Services" (only 3 pages in length) provides "guidance" to lawyers and law firms concerning the application of the new BC PST rules to the legal services provided by lawyers and law firms. (More after the jump)

                          Read More