Antitrust leniency programs: A disincentive to self-report?

By Yves Faguy July 31, 201731 July 2017

Antitrust leniency programs: A disincentive to self-report?


Morgan Lewis has a report out showing a major downward trend this year in cartel fines (only US $1.2 billion so far in 2017, compared to $7.8 billion for the full calendar year in 2016). In Canada fines have reached $9.9 in 2017, due to an ongoing automotive parts investigation.

Gabe Friedman reports on why the fines are dropping, in spite of the success of leniency programs adopted around the world over the last decade and a half.  He quotes antitrust partner Clay Everett who suggests that, ironically, the proliferation of leniency programs in different juridictions could be making it more difficult for those companies willing to self-report to be the first in order to secure a promise of immunity:

“There’s been a real surge in enforcement in those types of cases,” said Everett, adding that “a very high percentage of international cartel cases, in the past fifteen years, have been generated through the leniency programs.”

But he said the proliferation of “leniency” programs, and the increased penalties around the world for price-fixing, means that coming forward to self-report a violation now requires a more complicated calculus: There are so many authorities with overlapping jurisdictions, and many cartel members are skeptical that they will receive global credit for being first to self-disclose.

Thus, cartel members must make a strategic calculation about whether self-disclosing and receiving only partial credit is better than staying quiet and hoping authorities never learn about their cartel, Everett said.

Photo by chuttersnap on Unsplash

Filed Under:
No comments

Leave message

 Security code